(to list as well)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
Date: 10 February 2011 16:58
Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Least-worst present WYSIWYG solution?
To: "Haim (Howard) Roman" <roman(a)jct.ac.il>
On 10 February 2011 16:46, Haim (Howard) Roman <roman(a)jct.ac.il> wrote:
What do you mean by "good"? A full-fledged
office suite, e.g. Open or MS?
Auto-completion when typing in names of articles in your wiki, or
templates?
Just the editing window itself, so they never need to see wikitext.
As far as I can tell, Media Wiki was designed for
relatively simple
formatting. I admit I write in wiki-text, though I now tend to switch to
FCKeditor (Version 1.0.1) to edit tables. It does a pretty good job, and
allows you to go back & forth between wiki text & "rich editor" modes.
I shall give that a non-techie testing then!
- d.