If we can count Michael's comment about the orthography as an expert confirmation, then let's approve it.

If not, we need to find another expert.

I'd be liberal and say Yes, let's approve.


--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

2016-04-25 14:09 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi,
The question is not only if it is eligible ... we agree that it is. The question is what needs to be done to reach the final stage.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 21 April 2016 at 20:12, Antony Green <toniogreen@web.de> wrote:
I agree, it's eligible.


Am 2016-04-21 um 15:13 schrieb Michael Everson:
On 21 Apr 2016, at 05:15, Oliver Stegen <oliver_stegen@sil.org> wrote:
If we're talking about Patois (ISO code jam), then it's definitely a valid language. I vote for accepting it.
I’ve looked at it and it’s just the same orthography I’ve published in http://www.evertype.com/books/alice-jam.html

This is definitely good to go.

Michael Everson
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

--
Dr. Antony Green
Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31
WE 1703
10369 Berlin
E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de
Mobile: +49-176-82295920



_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom


_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom