In an ideal world we could have a very conservative cut-off point and explicitly mark all things before this date as PD.

If only we had a complete set of these: http://publicdomain.okfn.org/calculators

Maybe one day!

In any case, if there were willingness from to do this at KB, it would be a shame not to PD mark much of this material because of uncertainty surrounding a few possible edge cases.

J.


On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
On 1 November 2012 13:46, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray@okfn.org> wrote:
> Great - thanks Ole!
>
> So - from the point of view of prospective reusers - does this mean that
> e-books from DOD can be freely circulated and reused (as per
> opendefinition.org)? E.g. will scanned e-books or digital editions be made
> available with a legal waiver (Public Domain Mark / CC0) or equivalent "no
> rights reserved" legal disclaimers?

Is this a little risky? I'm all for making definitely-PD material
available, but I would assume that a good proportion of late-19th
century material is potentially still in copyright - the traditional
"safe" cutoff date is around 1870.

Unless it checks on a case-by-case basis, the KB would be tagging
material that is likely to still be in copyright, and while it's
probably safe for them to make it available, I don't know if we should
be encouraging using PD marks for possibly unfree material.

--
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk

_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam



--
Jonathan Gray

Head of Community
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://www.okfn.org

http://twitter.com/jwyg