Thanks all for the feedback. I've started a discussion on-wiki, at 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Feminism#Gender_neutrality_template

Andreas

--- On Sat, 1/10/11, Daniel and Elizabeth Case <dancase@frontiernet.net> wrote:

From: Daniel and Elizabeth Case <dancase@frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Gender neutrality template
To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects" <gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Saturday, 1 October, 2011, 20:29

 

I love the idea of having articles of gender concern in a one stop shopping space. Going through the NPOV collection is long, painful and is filled with lots of advertising articles for tech companies. Blarghhhh

-Sarah
   I agree with a gender-specific tag as well. NPOV is (by design) vague and, to me, not quite the fit we need as it is best applied to allegedly non-neutral use of language (in obvious cases of POV language, I just fix it ... there's no need to discuss). We ourselves already have {{globalize}}
 
 
for the situation of articles reflecting only the experience of one particular region of the world or country. I don't see why gender bias couldn't be addressed the same way.
 
Daniel Case

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap