The reporter refers it as Wikipedia / Wikimedia on several times on the article, in case you haven't noticed it. 
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HKL/2011/03/22/ArticleHtmls/Wiki-wants-women-22032011101054.shtml?Mode=1 

I respect your opinion but for most part of world, Wiki means Wikipedia and not necessarily Wikileaks :) 

Please note that the article was written by journo ( err... journalist) from the media publication and not me. 

Regards
Tinu Cherian 


On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> wrote:
Hi CherianTinu,

On Tuesday 22 Mar 2011 13:34:18 CherianTinu Abraham wrote:
> FYI
>
>
> *The Hindustan Times ( Kolkata edition) : "Wiki wants Women"*
> http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HKL/2011/03/22/ArticleHtml
> s/Wiki-wants-women-22032011101054.shtml?Mode=1
>

"Wiki wants Women".

>
> *The international media is abuzz with the gender gap in Wikipedia
> contributors around the world. Also, a survey by Wikimedia Foundation shows
> that English Wiki has only 13% women editors. To level this skewed ratio,

"English Wiki".

I would have taken this article more seriously, if it hadn't called
"Wikipedia" simply "Wiki":

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiWikiWeb

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Note that "wikip" is a useful shorthand for "Wikipedia" on IRC/IM/etc. but not
simply "Wiki". This kind of mental sloppiness always makes me think that the
person who say that is an idiot.

Regards,

       Shlomi Fish

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish       http://www.shlomifish.org/
Understand what Open Source is - http://shlom.in/oss-fs

I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in
mind.                  -- Alan Kay (Attributed)

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .