On 6/23/2014 11:45 AM, Derric Atzrott wrote:

 

This comment to me comes off as exactly the opposite of the sort of thing that I would want to see on this list.  We are here to cooperate on reducing the gender-gap and this means that we should all work civilly together to do so. 


Over the last two years I have made a number of constructive suggestions to increase female participation, a few are below, plus some new ones that occur as I write:

* bring back Wikipedia:Wikiquette_assistance since women may not want to got to WP:ANI for low grade constant nonsense
* take complaints about harassment in general more seriously
* Have a "class action" Arbitration on Sexism/Double standards so that discretionary sanctions could be imposed on obvious incidents
* (new one) quota of 1/3 women admins and 1/3 women arbitrators (and other positions?)
* (new one) A GenderGap wikiproject on every wiki, since it can be troublesome having to go all the way to http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gender_gap to contact women about what to do with specific issues; (wikiprojects like feminism and gender and womens studies more article and policy related than recruitment and problem solving related)

The archives probably have other early suggestions by women I've forgotten.  Now a days the only alternatives seem to be doing studies, counting numbers, posting mainstream media articles about what Wikipedia is allegedly doing and links to problematic articles.

Not enough to solve the problem.