Rather, another layer, that of "having your paper cited by others as a foundation for their own research"
At that point, I would think it's acceptable. Too often new surprising results turn out to be errors.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Gristock <gristock@me.com>
To: Wikimedia Education <education@lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Thu, Jul 10, 2014 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Education] Overcoming a roadblock to engagement
Sent from my mobile
> On 10 Jul 2014, at 19:57, Wjhonson <wjhonson@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> Once those findings have been verified by others in that field, we are in a
different territory of course.
> "New surprising findings", self-contributed, are anathema to encyclopedias.
>
In other words, Peer review. We're talking about citing published papers. Not
just citing from your own website or anything like that of course!
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education