Brian, 

All and all I think this is a great improvement, I think the things that Brion points out are valid and would improve the design, with the gaps in spacing now it can look a little haphazard depending on the mix of images. 

Being aware of mobile/touch UI and users is at the forefront of our minds in all of our design work and we'll need an answer for this case as well. Great work, and I look forward to seeing how it evolves. 

Jared



Jared Zimmerman  \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation               
M : +1 415 609 4043 |   :  @JaredZimmerman



On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Brion Vibber <bvibber@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:36 PM, bawolff <bawolff+wn@gmail.com> wrote:
Over the last couple days, I've been looking at making our <gallery> tag a lot more slick. Compared to other websites, our galleries look very "boxy" imo. This isn't that bad when it comes to icon/clip art type media, but for photos I feel we could really do better. So I've tried to make the galleries be more compact, with rows of images all the same height but different width, and the caption visible on hover. The only downside to this is the borders of the gallery become a little ragged, which mostly looks fine to me (Possibly could be dealt with with js. Would involve a bit of double loading the images though).

I like the overall look, couple notes:
* Think about tablet and mobile views -- galleries are even awfuller on mobile right now than on desktop. This means a) consider touchscreens and b) consider small screens.
* I'm not sold on "show title on hover". Touchscreens don't do hover...
* Ragged edges can be fixed by adjusting spacing or aspect ratio a little, like justifying text. This would look awesome. :)
* We need to fix what happens when clicking the items -- should get a nice zoomed lightbox or something. This should be shared with non-gallery media however, so can be outside this present scope.

Another related thing to consider is Category page gallery displays... having a gallery-style display for contained media is relatively easy, but how can we show subcategories nicely? What about non-visual media? Can we display them better than we do now?

-- brion

_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design