On 27/09/2007, Barcex <barcexwiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2007/9/26, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>om>:
On 9/26/07, Barcex <barcexwiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Magnus:
>
> Does cc-sa exist? cc-by-sa "similar license" should be another
cc-license?
Apparently it does, but it seems to be a CC-BY-SA alias:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
I'll remove it later, unless I forget, or someone edits the SVG first...
Magnus
I see it existed, we have about 3000 images licenced with cc-sa-1.0
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:CC-SA-1.0
Anyway, I suggest not to include that license in the diagram in order to
simplify it, if possible.
I agree. And if by "X" (cross) you mean "yes", I suggest replacing it
with a tick/check-mark. Cross looks very confusing to me.
Also remove the heading from the graphic.
but nice, for a quick hack. :) it takes me hours to come up with stuff
a tenth as useful.
cheers,
Brianna
--
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
http://modernthings.org/