But we do it automatically anyway. We transform the statement into a license tag, and include the name of the contributor in the tag. Why should we create a new mechanism and involved the OTRS when we can transfer this information directly to the Commons?

Dror K

ציטוט Yann Forget:

Hello,

Dror Kamir wrote:
  

- People who upload images to the Pikiwiki interface sign a legally
binding statement in Hebrew. There is no use showing you the statement
unless you speak Hebrew. I can translate it, but why on earth don't you
trust the word of a recognized Wikimedia chapter, and two known Israeli
NGOs that all they do is legal? Especially as the names of the
contributors are available to you.
    
        

Could a (low-res) scan of each of these statements be automatically
mailed (or otherwise transfered) to OTRS?
  
      

- We have the statement in Hebrew and a list of people who signed it.
The interface is built in a way that prevents uploads unless the
statement is signed. What exactly should I send the OTRS?
    

I would say, send a copy of the statement in Hebrew and a list of people
who signed it. Then the bot can include the OTRS permission in the
description. That is how other upload projects work, and all what people
demand.

Regards,

Yann