Hello everyone

I have a question about the licence at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Pink_Sponge_isolated_on_White_Background.jpg&oldid=240970568

There is a general self|cc-by-sa-4.0|attribution= template displaying, in part

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

However, there is also a bespoke declaration

A statement such as "From Wikimedia Commons" or similar is not by itself sufficient. If you do not provide clear attribution to the author and indicate the file name as shown here, you didn't comply with the terms of the file's license and may not use this file. If you are unable or unwilling to provide attribution and release your own work that incorporates this work with a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license you should contact Jonatan Svensson Glad to negotiate a different license.

These declarations are incompatible in two respects. Firstly, the attribution requirements are different, and secondly the reuse conditions are different, replacing "build upon" with "incorporate" -- these are clearly different, and indeed if they are not different, why would the uploader have written a different one for themselves?

Anyway, given the incompatibility between the two declarations, should this file be on Commons at all?

JPS