Sensible! I could. The code is already running, mind, so it would require a
restart. But, I'm not seeing why "logged-in" people are a distinct subgroup
for the purpose of disabling HTTPS. If we just want "editors", I can get
editors, of course.
On 15 October 2014 17:45, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
Is there any way you can look at traffic for
particular pages? If so,
you could look at traffic to something like Special:Watchlist or
Special:UserLogin on a representative sample of wikis - anyone using
these two pages is very likely to represent a logged-in user, and
traffic numbers to them are high enough you might get useful data even
with the sampling limits.
Andrew.
On 15 October 2014 21:50, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Darnit. Ah well! Okay; finished building the code
to retrieve this data.
Takes ~400 seconds to handle a day of logs, so take into account
parallelisation and I should (should!) have something to show in a
couple of
hours for the first 3 Qs. The fourth, it seems,
is beyond our ken.
On 15 October 2014 15:54, Max Semenik <maxsem.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There's no data for IE6 in EventLogging because IE6 gets no JS these
days.
> Maybe, if there's old enough data...
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Update: Yuvi's pointed me towards a login attempts schema. All 4 are
>> doable. Data tomorrow morning EST at the latest.
>>
>> On 15 October 2014 15:19, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> (With "jiffy" read "a day"; even with sampling, big logs
are big, and
I
>>> imagine we probably want ~30 days of
data.)
>>>
>>> On 15 October 2014 15:18, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> First three are pretty trivial; last one is a bit of a pain, but
doable
>>>> if someone wants to poke me on
IRC (/query Ironholds) and chat about
what an
>>>> unambiguous successful login
action would look like in terms of
requests.
>>>> But I can do the first three in a
jiffy.
>>>>
>>>> On 15 October 2014 13:32, Brandon Black <bblack(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You invoked my name!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Emphasis is "logged-in". If you guys want more solid
overall
numbers,
>>>>>> I can get those in short
order; this seems like a pretty critical
question
>>>>>> to have data on, fast.
Lemme know.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can source some good reliable numbers, probably what we care
>>>>> about (all of which have been estimated to some degree in this
thread
>>>>> already, I think?) is:
>>>>>
>>>>> % of all requests from IE6
>>>>> % of all https requests from IE6
>>>>> % of all text/html https requests from IE6 (not so important IMHO,
if
>>> it's difficult)
>>> % of all logged-in https requests (or alternatively, % of all
>>> successful https login attempts) from IE6.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oliver Keyes
>> Research Analyst
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>
>
>
>
> --
> Oliver Keyes
> Research Analyst
> Wikimedia Foundation
--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
Best regards,
Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics