On Dec 13, 2013 1:56 PM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Denny Vrandečić, 13/12/2013 03:11:
>
>> I am wondering whether Wikidata is included in this table?
>>
>> http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/graphs/active_editors
>>
>> It looks like it is not, since it has >3.5k active editors but is not in
>> the list on the left, but I would like to be sure.
>>
>> If it is not, why not? The project has been active for over a year.
>
>
> Wikivoyage is not included, either. The reportcard is used by the WMF to assess trends relating to their annual/strategic plan; introducing too many variables like new projects can make comparability impossible, so they're probably putting a lot of thought in this. Maybe you should bring this up in <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Refining_the_definition_of_monthly_active_editors>.
> stats.wikimedia.org is more free from such considerations and has all the data, so it can be used by anyone for their own digging. ;-)

http://stats.wikimedia.org/ is also missing many newish wikis, such as Minangkabau Wikipedia (min), which was created in January.

--
Johm Vandenberg